Murphy's Law of Sunbathing in Sarah's Backyard: When you shed the
swimsuit top, the lawn care staff will appear. I had time to retie, to
snatch up the patriotic picnic blanket I was basking on, and to stumble
deck-ward, water bottle in tow, but left behind my volume of Ovid's
less yawn-inducing verse. I was reading The Amores,
which begin as a mock-epic and are entertaining beyond belief and
translated much more idiomatically (and delightfully so) than my crude,
too-literal attempts made in early April. But Penguin chose to couple
them with the Ars Amores and call the collection The Erotic Poems.
I'm not afraid of The Erotic in literature. I can remember scouring The Bluest Eye
when I was seven, and all of those other best-selling Oprah-endorsed
novels that I'm too Book Snobby to even skim now. My mother devours
romance novels and shouts out the more laughable adverbs; extreme
overuse of "infinitesimally" sent us into a synchronized Scottish
Breakfast Blend-spitting-fit that I'll never forget. I struggle at
times with seeing everything as Erotic, for unlike some of my Literary
Gods, life doesn't daily grab me by the shoulders and shake me and say "I'm
all about biological impulses!!!" but there's an erring-on-risque
Chagall print on my wall and sex is seeping from my bookshelves and I
bought this volume all alone a few months ago, plunked it down on the
counter at some big-name bookseller and may have just imagined the
mid-50s-ish salesman grimmace before pretending not to notice the
playful way he made the "joy" in his "enjoy" last an extra syllable.
But The Amores aren't even erotic in that sense, not in the least!
Try telling that to the staff of Southern 20-somethings who retrieve
your copy and hand it to you, smirking, eyebrow-raising, Why isn't
Fabio on the Cover?-ing.
On a less I Think I'm Beginning to Hate this Experience-y note... My
mother seems to think that my future relationships will fall into one
of several categories, each with a unique set of consequences
("consequences" seems needlessly pejorative. This isn't a bad thing,
and I've no disdain for her input, for she reads cognitive science
journals the way most mothers around here page through Southern Living
(absently, relating gleaned facts gleefully, scissors in hand; think
"Oh look, 15 Ways to Doll Up Your Formal Dining Room with Daffodils!"
only "Oh look, a factbox about Limbic Mode!", wears cat shoes
occasionally, and wrote new insect-themed lyrics to that "Baby I'm a
Thug" rap song of short-lived ubiquity ("'Cause I'm a Ladybug") to
liven up a science unit (ergo makes my Coolest People Ever list in an
instant). These are the broad categories:
1.) The Mr. Knightly:
Tall
Dark
Handsome
Will scold me
2.) The Sweet, Practical, Mindful-of-My-Passions Guy:
Great job
Well-rounded
Can enjoy the same things I do, but not nearly with the same degree of intensity
Tame evenings of cooking together, watching the news, reading our
respective Books of the Moment (his is probably a Grisham-y whatnot.
Kill me.), sleeping, arising, repeating
3.) The Self-absorbed Investment Banker:
Power suit
Power dining
Power trip
I do the entertaining
4.) The Implode Guy
Witty banter, hysterical laughter, reparterepartereparte!
Manic everything
Can't slow down
The Ted Hughes to my Sylvia Plath. Before things went to hell.
My mother and grandmother have made it clear that I require a cross
between Mr. Knightly and our fairweather friend, The I-banker. .
"He won't understand my love of literature my Bohemian earrings my
Auden at 4 a.m. and won't want to stay up an hour longer to watch the
sun rise!"
"Good, they're your passions, not his. He'll keep you in check."
"You need a strong man!"
"You need a stabling influence."
"You need that Fear and Awe element."
"You need someone who relies on you for certain things."
And I? These days I think of nothing but Imploding.
Recent Comments